Hammer or Hammerless Snubbies?
Smith & Wesson Model 637 with a hammer
Smith & Wesson Model 638 "Hammerless"Actually, the "hammerless" model still has a hammer, but it's concealed.
Each design has its advantages, and Kim at The Other Side of Kim has a lot of good information to consider on this subject.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhIPLasJ_tww-3frOt3tBdVwY4FvKHSz_j-OfYjSxBMs-C0-zJsGcNrE0HGE0LE82knxQBdPfbneKDORJSLXZDrlVUFPaZFdXsoabincYL1n7EpbB0nekai-lCb0v6lRByd2uFCRg/s220/BlogPic2.JPG")
3 Comments:
I've always favored the "old fashoned" exposed hammer, probably because I like the ability to quickly & easily cock the the hammer. Also, I find the traditional look more appealing. As far as I can see, exposed hammers are only a problem inside a pocket, etc. If they are in a pocket or IWB holster they don't snag, plus are better protected from debris.
Merle
I've been carrying a 642 for a few years now. I can drop in onto an inner suit jacket pocket, if needs be. I'm not always in a situation where I can were a holster, or even tuck the .38 away in a hip pocket. No problems so far - I just never put ANYTHING in the same pocket, and check the barrel and cylinder often for debris.
"...can drop it into an inner suit jacket pocket..." Always preview, he said...
OldeForce
Post a Comment
<< Home